AI Task Exposure Gap Analysis
Sector benches, occupation breadth, concentration, and a heatmap of where exposed tasks do — and do not — appear across the sector-by-occupation matrix.
Total Exposed Tasks
Top-Tier Sectors
Top 5 Sector Share
Moderate sector concentration
Top 10 Occupation Share
Broad occupation spread
What pushes back on the consensus
The dataset is much less about one “safe” sector and much more about a broad, multi-sector bench of exposed work.
Professional services check
Sector gap leaderboard
Tasks, share, and deviation from the cross-sector average benchmark.
| Sector | Tasks | Share | Gap vs Avg |
|---|
Professional services occupation slice
Internal mix inside Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services.
| Occupation | Tasks | Share of Sector |
|---|
1) Sector exposure ranking
Professional services lands in the top tier, but it shares that position with most of the sample rather than standing apart from it.
2) Sector gap from the even-share benchmark
The widest underrepresentation gap sits in Retail Trade; nearly every other sector is clustered just above the average.
3) Sector concentration (Pareto view)
A handful of sectors matter, but not to an extreme degree: the first five account for just over half of exposed tasks.
4) Occupation concentration curve
Occupation exposure is unusually flat — no small set of occupations dominates the task bench.
5) Sector-by-occupation gap heatmap
Colored cells mark where exposed tasks appear; the empty cells show the gaps. Occupations are grouped by their associated sector to make the bench structure easier to read.
6) Coverage hierarchy across sectors and occupations
The hierarchy shows a wide sector spread and an almost perfectly even occupation split inside each sector branch.