Jan 2000 – May 2026 • 5-chart macro relationship set
The sample spans Jan 2000 through May 2026, with the rolling-correlation view beginning in Dec 2002. The chart mix applies the requested selection rules directly: 2 charts from G1, 2 from G2, and 1 from G3.
The inflation-unemployment sample has a Pearson correlation of -0.43, indicating a moderate inverse tradeoff across overlapping observations. The Fed Funds / GDP overlap is weaker at 0.09, so the time-path view matters more than a simple static slope.
Latest monthly readings show a 3.63% Fed Funds rate, a 4.48% 10-year yield, 4.17% inflation, and 4.30% unemployment. The latest GDP reading is 2.68% in Jan 2026, while the 36-month policy/yield correlation is -0.08.
The rolling Fed Funds / 10Y correlation peaked at 0.93 in Feb 2024 and troughed at -0.91 in Feb 2015. The 10Y minus Fed Funds spread was negative for 66 months in the full sample, which is shaded directly in the rate-path chart.
| Chart name | Group | Commonality | Why it fits | Required columns | Optional columns | Suggested mappings | One-sentence insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy Rate vs 10-Year Yield Timeline | G1 — Rates & transmission | 0.93 | Foundational view of the short-rate path against the long-end response across cycles. | observation_date, FEDFUNDS, DGS10 | Rate_Spread_10Y_minus_FF | x=date; y=rate (%); color=series; tooltip=date + exact yields | Short and long rates moved together across major cycles, but the long end remained above the policy rate by the latest observation. |
| 36-Month Rolling Correlation of Fed Funds and 10Y Yield | G1 — Rates & transmission | 0.91 | Directly addresses the requested co-movement diagnostic and exposes regime shifts not visible in level charts. | observation_date, Rolling_Corr_FF_Yield_36m | FEDFUNDS, DGS10 | x=date; y=rolling correlation; color=positive/negative regime; tooltip=date + correlation | The three-year correlation swung from strongly positive to slightly negative by 2026, signaling a softer lockstep between policy and the long end. |
| Inflation vs Unemployment Scatter | G2 — Macro tradeoffs | 0.89 | Best compact form for the requested inflation-unemployment relationship while preserving rate regime context. | Inflation_YoY, UNRATE | observation_date, FEDFUNDS, DGS10 | x=unemployment; y=inflation; color=Fed Funds; tooltip=date + macro values | The sample retains a modest inverse inflation-unemployment relationship, with higher policy-rate episodes clustering in hotter inflation conditions. |
| Real GDP Growth vs Fed Funds Rate Path | G2 — Macro tradeoffs | 0.87 | Pairs the requested growth measure with the policy path over time without losing quarterly GDP swings. | observation_date, GDP_YoY, FEDFUNDS | Rate_Spread_10Y_minus_FF | x=date; y=gdp growth; y2=Fed Funds; color=series; tooltip=date + exact values | Growth slowed through the late-tightening phase and then stabilized as the policy rate eased from its peak. |
| Macro Relationship Correlation Heatmap | G3 — Multivariate summary | 0.82 | Non-redundant summary layer that shows which pairings are strongest once overlapping observations are aligned. | FEDFUNDS, DGS10, Inflation_YoY, UNRATE, GDP_YoY | none | x=indicator; y=indicator; color=Pearson correlation; tooltip=pair + coefficient | Rates share the strongest positive relationship with each other, while unemployment tends to move opposite to both inflation and policy rates. |