Standalone breakdown of monthly expense gaps and project-level cost overruns, with ranking views that separate true dollar exposure from percentage-only noise.
The project monitoring feed shows the live overrun picture: spread across four project types, led by .
The monthly expense feed behaves differently: every category and every month carries $0 actuals, so percentage variance is flat at -100% throughout. In that view, the only reliable way to prioritize attention is by absolute dollars, not percentages.
The main trap to avoid is ranking solely by percentage: looks less alarming on relative terms, but still represents a large dollar miss, while small expense lines share the same extreme percentage as much larger lines.
Lines with lower relative variance can still move a large amount of cash when the budget base is large.
If several lines share the same percentage miss, use absolute variance to decide what is actually worth escalation.
The monthly expense series shows an identical all-zero actuals pattern across the year, which keeps the gap unresolved in every month.
| Line | Group | Absolute variance | Percent variance | Why it is flagged |
|---|