UBS vs ABB: SEC Financial Comparison

Interactive comparison of reported revenue trajectory, profitability profile, balance-sheet mix, and revenue cyclicality using the extracted SEC financial series in USD.

ABB revenue CAGR
2009–2023
Latest reported revenue year:
UBS revenue CAGR
2018–2022
Latest reported revenue year:
Revenue growth volatility
UBS / ABB ratio
Higher value indicates larger year-over-year swings.
Latest leverage gap
UBS minus ABB
Compares the latest reported leverage ratio for each company.
Comparison framing

The two companies report on very different balance-sheet models: ABB is an industrial group with a comparatively compact asset base, while UBS is a large banking platform with a much larger asset pool and structurally higher leverage. The dashboard therefore focuses on directionality and capital mix rather than raw scale alone.

Data availability is uneven across the extracted series. ABB has full revenue and balance-sheet history but only two early net-margin and ROE observations in this extract, while UBS has revenue through 2022 and ROE through 2025. Charts explicitly use the latest available year for each metric and note overlapping comparison windows where relevant.

Latest reported snapshot
Entity Revenue Net income Total assets Equity Leverage ROE
G1 · Revenue trajectory
Reported revenue history by fiscal year; UBS series ends where revenue becomes unavailable in the extract.
Type: multi-line scatter
Focus: scale + trend
Coverage: ABB 2009–2023, UBS 2018–2022
G2 · Margin profile
Average profitability measures from the available filings; hover shows the sample years behind each bar.
Type: grouped bar
Focus: net margin + ROE
Caveat: ABB margin history is sparse in the extract
G3 · Balance-sheet strength
Latest comparable asset funding mix (2023) paired with leverage, highlighting the size and capital-structure contrast.
Type: stacked bar + leverage markers
Focus: equity cushion vs liabilities
Comparable year: 2023
G4 · Cyclicality
Year-over-year revenue changes for overlapping revenue years, used as a simple cyclicality proxy.
Type: grouped bar
Focus: revenue volatility
Overlap window: 2019–2022 growth observations