Adverse-Event Reporting Quality Dashboard

Patterns in case completeness, timeliness, follow-up, database entry, causality assessment, and escalation across reporter, facility, medicine, patient-group, and serious-case workflows.

Reports analyzed
Serious cases
Avg completeness
On-time reporting
Follow-up obtained
Causality assessed
Entered in VigiBase
Serious escalation
What the numbers say the blocker is

The workflow is failing upstream: completeness remains low, only a minority of reports are on time, follow-up is rare, and formal causality assessment is missing in most cases. The pattern is broad enough that the bottleneck looks structural rather than tied to a single reporter or medicine line.

    Impact-ranked blocker ladder

    Impact index is a volume-weighted composite of underperformance versus overall on completeness, on-time reporting, follow-up, causality assessment, and VigiBase entry. Higher values mean larger operational drag, not higher clinical risk.

    Serious-case checkpoint

    Reporter-type quality profile
    Heatmap compares completeness and key reporting-process rates; darker cells mark weaker performance.
    Facility-type quality profile
    Private clinics and tertiary hospitals cluster toward the weakest combination of follow-up, timeliness, and assessment quality.
    Medicine classes with the deepest reporting gaps
    Lower-left bubbles combine poor follow-up and weak causality assessment; bubble size shows report volume and color shows serious-case share.
    Patient-group reporting gaps
    Bars show process quality; the line shows the share of reports marked serious.
    Where the reporting process breaks down most, ranked by impact
    Top segments combine below-average quality with enough volume to matter operationally.
    Serious-case workflow attrition
    Serious cases are common, but escalation endpoints remain absent in the supplied data.
    Serious-case quality metrics barely move together
    Pairwise correlations within serious cases are near zero; direct action correlation is not estimable because serious-case actions are uniformly zero.
    Impact-ranked summary table
    Top segments across reporter type, facility type, medicine class, and patient group.
    Rank Factor Segment N Completeness On-time Follow-up Assessed VigiBase Serious Action Impact index
    Serious-case quality checks vs escalation
    Each quality checkpoint shows zero signaling and zero regulatory action among serious cases.
    Factor State Serious N Avg completeness Signal rate Action rate
    Serious cases by causality class
    Most serious reports remain unassessed, and no causality class shows downstream signals or actions.
    Causality class Serious N Completeness On-time Follow-up Signal rate Action rate